Electronics. Pexels Image.
This page covers Arm Holdings’ number of patents issued and pending approval on a global basis.
Beyond the raw patent counts, we also look at Arm’s issued patents per employee to gauge how extensively the company files for patent approval relative to its workforce size.
Let’s dive in!
For other key statistics of Arm Holdings, you may find more information on this page: Arm key statistics.
Please use the table of contents to navigate this page.
Table Of Contents
Definitions And Overview
Insight & Summary of Observed Trends
Z1. Insight & Summary of Arm’s Patents Ownership and Patent Per Employee
Patent Numbers
A1. Patents Issued, Application Pending, and % owned by Arm
Per Employee Results
A2. Average Headcount and Patents Per Employee
Reference, Credits, and Disclosure
S1. References and Credits
S2. Disclosure
Definitions
To help readers understand the content better, the following terms and glossaries have been provided.
Arm’s Patents:
Arm Holdings’ patents refers to the company’s global intellectual property portfolio protecting its core business — the design and licensing of CPU architecture, GPU designs, system IP, physical IP, and related semiconductor technology.
Since Arm doesn’t manufacture chips itself, its patent portfolio is effectively its product — protecting the designs it licenses to customers like Apple, Qualcomm, TSMC, and Samsung is central to how the company monetizes its IP.
Two categories, as disclosed in Arm’s own SEC filings:
Issued Patents — patents that have been formally granted by a patent office and are legally enforceable.
Pending Patent Applications — applications that have been filed but not yet granted; these represent IP still working through examination, not yet enforceable but reserving priority rights.
What the portfolio covers: the majority of Arm’s patents and applications fall into five technology categories:
- Processor architecture and microarchitecture
- Machine learning and computer vision
- Graphics processor architecture
- On-chip system design
- Memory technology
Insight & Summary of Arm’s Patents Ownership and Patent Per Employee
Arm Holdings’ patent portfolio grew steadily over FY2023–FY2026, but the company’s headcount expanded even faster — producing a clear and consistent decline in patents generated per employee, worth flagging as the central tension in this dataset.
-
Patent Ownership: Steady Portfolio Growth with a Decelerating Pace Total patents issued rose from 6,800 (FY2023) to 8,600 (FY2026), a 26% increase over three years. Growth wasn’t linear, however: issued-patent growth accelerated from 8.8% (FY2024) to a peak of 10.1% (FY2025), before decelerating sharply to 5.5% in FY2026 — the slowest pace of the period.
Total patents pending held roughly flat at 2,500 in FY2024 and FY2025, before rising to 2,750 in FY2026, suggesting a renewed uptick in new filings even as the issued-patent growth rate cooled. The share of the portfolio owned solely by Arm or jointly with its own subsidiaries improved slightly and then held steady, from 97.0% (FY2023) to 98.0% from FY2024 onward — a consistently high level of direct ownership control over the portfolio throughout.
-
Patents Per Employee: A Clear and Persistent Decline This is the most notable trend in the dataset. Issued Patents Per Employee rose marginally from 1.11 (FY2023) to a peak of 1.13 (FY2024), then declined in each of the following two years — to 1.06 (FY2025) and 0.96 (FY2026), a level below where the ratio started. The driver is straightforward: Average Headcount grew 46% over the period (6,146 to 8,957), meaningfully outpacing the 26% growth in issued patents over the same window. In other words, Arm has been hiring faster than it has been generating new granted patents, causing per-employee patent productivity to erode steadily since its FY2024 peak.
-
Cross-Metric Comparison Reading the portfolio and per-employee trends together sharpens the picture: the deceleration in issued-patent growth (10.1% in FY2025 down to 5.5% in FY2026) coincided with continued strong headcount growth, compounding the per-employee decline rather than offsetting it. The rebound in pending patents in FY2026 (2,500 to 2,750) is a potentially encouraging signal for future issued-patent growth, but it hasn’t yet reversed the per-employee productivity trend, since pending applications aren’t yet issued patents.
-
Structural Takeaway: Arm’s patent portfolio has grown in absolute terms throughout this period, and its ownership structure has remained stable and highly concentrated (98% Arm-controlled), but patent output has not kept pace with the company’s workforce expansion — Issued Patents Per Employee has fallen in each of the last two years and now sits below its FY2023 starting level.
Whether this reflects a genuine slowdown in inventive output per researcher, a lag effect from recent hiring not yet reflected in granted patents, or a deliberate shift in R&D headcount toward non-patent-generating functions (e.g., software, AI tooling, customer engineering) isn’t distinguishable from this data alone. The FY2026 uptick in pending applications is the one metric most worth monitoring going forward — if it converts into a reacceleration of issued-patent growth in FY2027, the per-employee ratio could stabilize or recover; if headcount continues outpacing patent issuance, the decline is likely to persist.
The table below combines all Arm’s patents metrics into a single view for the latest three fiscal years.
Arm’s Patents Statistics — Averages (FY2024–FY2026)
| Metric | 3-Year Average (FY2024–FY2026) |
|---|---|
| Patent Ownership Results | |
| Total Patents Issued | 8,050 |
| Issued Patents Growth | 8.1% |
| Total Patents Pending | 2,583 |
| % of Patents Owned by Arm or Jointly with Subsidiaries | 98.0% |
| Patents Per Employee | |
| Average Headcount | 7,734 |
| Issued Patents Per Employee | 1.05 |
Averages cover FY2024–FY2026. Patent and employee counts rounded to nearest whole unit. Ratio and growth rounded to one decimal place; per-employee ratio rounded to two decimal places.
Patents Issued, Application Pending, and % owned by Arm
View data as table
Arm Patents Ownership Overview — All Metrics by Fiscal Year
| Fiscal Year | Total Patents Issued | Issued Patents Growth | Total Patents Pending | % of Patents Owned by Arm or Jointly with Subsidiaries |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6,800 | N.A. | 2,700 | 97.0% |
| 2024 | 7,400 | 8.8% | 2,500 | 98.0% |
| 2025 | 8,150 | 10.1% | 2,500 | 98.0% |
| 2026 | 8,600 | 5.5% | 2,750 | 98.0% |
Patent Ownership Results — Averages (FY2024–FY2026)
| Metric | 3-Year Average (FY2024–FY2026) |
|---|---|
| Total Patents Issued | 8,050 |
| Issued Patents Growth | 8.1% |
| Total Patents Pending | 2,583 |
| % of Patents Owned by Arm or Jointly with Subsidiaries | 98.0% |
Averages cover FY2024–FY2026. Patent and employee counts rounded to nearest whole unit. Ratio and growth rounded to one decimal place; per-employee ratio rounded to two decimal places.
Average Headcount and Patents Per Employee
View data as table
Arm Patents Per Employee — All Metrics by Fiscal Year
| Fiscal Year | Average Headcount | Issued Patents Per Employee |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6,146 | 1.11 |
| 2024 | 6,531 | 1.13 |
| 2025 | 7,713 | 1.06 |
| 2026 | 8,957 | 0.96 |
Patents Per Employee — Averages (FY2024–FY2026)
| Metric | 3-Year Average (FY2024–FY2026) |
|---|---|
| Average Headcount | 7,734 |
| Issued Patents Per Employee | 1.05 |
Averages cover FY2024–FY2026. Patent and employee counts rounded to nearest whole unit. Ratio and growth rounded to one decimal place; per-employee ratio rounded to two decimal places.
References and Credits
1. All financial figures presented were obtained and referenced from Arm’s quarterly and annual reports published on the company’s investor relations page: Arm Financial Reports.
2. Pexels Images.
Back To Table Of Contents
Disclosure
We may use the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools to produce some of the text in this article. However, the data is directly obtained from original sources (usually the annual and quarterly reports) and meticulously cross-checked by our editors multiple times to ensure its accuracy and reliability.
If you find the information in this article helpful, please consider sharing it on social media. Additionally, providing a link back to this article from any website can help us create more content like this in the future.
Thank you for your support and engagement! Your involvement helps us continue to provide high-quality, reliable content.
