AMD vs Nvidia: Research and Development (R&D) Spending

Group discussion. Pexels Images.

This article compares the research and development (R&D) spending of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and NVIDIA Corporation.

AMD is known for innovation and providing high-performance computing solutions for various applications, from personal computers to servers and gaming consoles. On the other hand, NVIDIA is best known for its innovations in graphics processing technology and artificial intelligence.

NVIDIA competes with AMD in the GPU market and has established itself as a major player in the tech industry with its cutting-edge innovations in graphics and AI technologies.

Both companies have poured significant resources into research and development, constantly striving to outdo each other in key areas like artificial intelligence, computing, and graphic processing.

Let’s check on both companies’ R&D expenses!

Investors looking for other statistics of AMD and NVIDIA may find more resources on these pages:

Sales

• AMD data center and gaming revenue,
• AMD revenue by country: U.S., Japan, China, Europe, Taiwan, etc.,
• Nvidia revenue and profit by segment,
• Nvidia data center revenue breakdown: Compute & Networking,

Profit Margin

• AMD profit margin breakdown by segment,

Other Comparison

• TSMC vs Samsung: R&D budget,
• TSMC vs Intel: R&D spending,
• AMD vs Intel: profit margin,
• AMD vs Nvidia: profit margin,

Please use the table of contents to navigate this page.

Definitions Of Ratio

To help readers understand the content better, the following terms and glossaries have been provided.

Portion of R&D attributed to Stock-Based Compensation (SBC) expenses: The Portion of R&D Attributed To Stock-Based Compensation Expenses refers to the fraction of a company’s total research and development (R&D) expenses accounted for by stock-based compensation provided to employees.

This includes any stock options, shares, or other equity incentives awarded as part of the compensation package for employees involved in R&D activities. It is typically expressed as a percentage and provides insight into how much of the R&D budget is dedicated to compensating employees through equity rather than direct cash salaries.

Here’s a formula to illustrate this concept:

\[\text{Portion Of R&D Attributed To SBC} = \left( \frac{\text{SBC Expense For R&D}}{\text{Total R&D Spending}} \right) \times 100\%\]

This metric helps stakeholders understand the extent to which stock-based compensation contributes to the overall R&D expenditure of a company.

R&D to Revenue Ratio: The R&D to revenue ratio is a financial metric measuring the proportion of a company’s revenue that is spent on research and development (R&D).

It is calculated by dividing the total R&D expenditures by the total revenue, usually expressed as a percentage. This ratio helps investors and analysts understand how much a company is investing in innovation and future growth relative to its sales.

The formula for the R&D to revenue ratio is:

\[\text{R&D to Revenue Ratio} = \left( \frac{\text{R&D Expenditures}}{\text{Total Revenue}} \right) \times 100\%\]

A higher R&D to revenue ratio indicates a stronger commitment to innovation and development, which can be crucial for long-term growth and competitiveness.

R&D to Gross Profit Ratio: The R&D to gross profit ratio is a financial metric measuring the proportion of a company’s gross profit that is spent on research and development (R&D).

This ratio helps investors and analysts evaluate how much of a company’s gross profit is being reinvested into innovation and future growth.

The formula for the R&D to gross profit ratio is:

\[\text{R&D to Gross Profit Ratio} = \left( \frac{\text{R&D Expenditures}}{\text{Gross Profit}} \right) \times 100\%\]

A higher R&D to gross profit ratio indicates a greater investment in innovation relative to the company’s profitability, which can be a sign of a commitment to long-term growth and competitiveness.

R&D to Operating Expenses Ratio: The R&D to operating expenses ratio is a financial metric measuring the proportion of a company’s operating expenses that are spent on research and development (R&D).

This ratio helps evaluate how much of the company’s total expenses are dedicated to innovation and future growth efforts.

The formula for the R&D to operating expenses ratio is:

\[\text{R&D to Operating Expenses Ratio} = \left( \frac{\text{R&D Expenditures}}{\text{Total Operating Expenses}} \right) \times 100\%\]

A higher R&D to operating expenses ratio indicates a greater commitment to innovation relative to the company’s overall spending, which can be a positive indicator of future growth potential. Comparing this ratio with industry peers can provide additional insights into a company’s investment in research and development.

Back To Table Of Contents

Who Is Winning The R&D Race?

In the R&D race, NVIDIA is currently ahead of AMD. Over the past decade, NVIDIA’s R&D spending has nearly doubled that of AMD. As of the latest figures, NVIDIA spends approximately $9 billion on R&D, while AMD’s R&D budget is around $6 billion. This significant investment disparity has allowed NVIDIA to focus heavily on AI and data center technologies, contributing to its market dominance.

Back To Table Of Contents

Insight & Summary of AMD and Nvidia’s R&D Comparison

The following analysis consolidates the trends observed for AMD and Nvidia’s research and development comparison for the 2019–2025 period.

• AMD steadily increased R&D spending from $1.5 billion in 2019 to over $8 billion in 2025, while Nvidia scaled far more aggressively, reaching nearly $18.5 billion in the same period.

• Despite the absolute gap, AMD consistently allocated a higher share of revenue to R&D, maintaining ratios in the 20–26% range, compared to Nvidia’s declining ratios that fell below 10% by 2025 as revenue growth outpaced investment.

• Relative to operating expenses, both companies devoted substantial proportions to R&D, with Nvidia trending higher at ~70–80% versus AMD’s ~53–69%.

• Gross profit comparisons show AMD’s R&D intensity remained structurally higher, often exceeding 45% of gross profit, while Nvidia’s fell to low double digits by 2025, reflecting efficiency at scale.

• Stock-based compensation (SBC) played a more modest role in AMD’s R&D, averaging ~8–17%, compared to Nvidia’s heavier reliance at ~19–29%. This highlights AMD’s greater cash-backed discipline versus Nvidia’s equity-driven investment model.

• In summary, AMD demonstrates consistent R&D intensity relative to revenue and profitability, signaling a strategy of focused innovation despite smaller scale.

• Nvidia, meanwhile, leverages massive absolute spending and higher OpEx allocation, cementing its leadership in AI and compute infrastructure. In essense, the contrast underscores AMD’s efficiency-driven innovation model versus Nvidia’s scale-driven dominance.

The table below combines all key Research and Development metrics into a single view for the latest three fiscal years.

Back To Table Of Contents

AMD Vs Nvidia In R&D Spending

As illustrated in the chart above, NVIDIA consistently invests significantly more in research and development (R&D) compared to AMD. This trend is evident across all the fiscal years depicted in the chart.

Back To Table Of Contents

AMD Vs Nvidia In Portion of R&D attributed to SBC expenses

You can find the definition of the portion of R&D attributed to SBC expenses here: portion of R&D attributed to stock-based compensation (SBC) expenses.

As illustrated in the chart above, AMD and Nvidia have dedicated a significant portion of their research and development spending to stock-based compensation expenses. Nvidia’s percentage of R&D spending incurred as stock-based compensation expense is much higher than AMD’s ratio, as shown in the graph above.

Back To Table Of Contents

AMD Vs Nvidia In R&D To Revenue Ratio

You can find the definition of the R&D to revenue ratio here: R&D To Revenue Ratio.

Back To Table Of Contents

AMD Vs Nvidia In R&D To Gross Profit Ratio

You can find the definition of the R&D to gross profit ratio here: R&D To Gross Profit Ratio.

Relative to gross profit, AMD’s R&D spending takes up a larger portion compared to NVIDIA, as illustrated in the chart above. This is primarily due to the substantial growth in NVIDIA’s gross profit over the past few years, which has resulted in a lower R&D to gross profit ratio for NVIDIA.

Back To Table Of Contents

AMD Vs Nvidia In R&D To Operating Expenses (OpEx) Ratio

You can find the definition of the R&D to OPEX ratio here: R&D To Operating Expenses Ratio.

With respect to operating expenses, NVIDIA’s research and development expenditures consume a significantly larger portion compared to AMD, as depicted in the graph above.

Back To Table Of Contents

References and Credits

1. All financial figures presented in this article were obtained and referenced from AMD’s annual reports published in the company’s investors relation page: AMD Financial Reports.

2. Pexels Images.

Back To Table Of Contents

Disclosure

References and examples such as tables, charts, and diagrams are constantly reviewed to avoid errors, but we cannot warrant the total correctness of all content.

The content in this article is for informational purposes only and is neither a recommendation nor a piece of financial advice to purchase a stock.

If you find the information in this article helpful, please consider sharing it on social media and also provide a link back to this article from any website so that more articles like this one can be created in the future.

Thank you!

Back To Table Of Contents